an effort to create searchable online databases for government expenditures
a tool to highlight the hypocrisy of tax hikers
Constitutional or statutory requirement to rein in growth of revenues end expenditures
a commitment made by elected officials and candidates for elected office never to raise taxes
Raising the bar for tax increases
Requiring a cool-off period for all bills with a fiscal impact
pork-barrel spending - the broken windows of the budget
Today, the President's National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform convened again to discuss the growing federal deficit. As we have explained before, any commission serious about addressing the nation's insolvency should be focused on the government's unsustainable spending, not the mounting debt. A fixation on the deficit clouds the lack of political will to cut spending and ultimately leads to higher taxes to plug the hole dug by exploding federal outlays.
Today's meeting proved this point - the hearing was dominated by discussion of a European-style Valued-Added Tax (or VAT), about which ATR has been warning taxpayers for years. The VAT is a favorable mode of taxation for lawmakers because it is entirely opaque - unlike the sales tax in the United States, which taxpayers can see calculated in the final price of a good, a VAT is applied to every step of production and is inherent in the price of a good. This makes a VAT easy to inflate and almost impossible to repeal.
ATR President Grover Norquist testified in front of the Commission at the end of June, and offered not one but fourteen separate alternatives to raising taxes that would restore fiscal sanity to the federal budget. In the face of viable spending reform lawmakers, and the Commission, have no excuse to be considering tax hikes that will sink the burgeoning economy. Below are Norquist's suggestions - which do you think is the best?
Click here to read Norquist's testimony in its entirety.

722 12th Street NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC
202-785-0261
friends@atr.org