Email this page

an effort to create searchable online databases for government expenditures

a tool to highlight the hypocrisy of tax hikers

Constitutional or statutory requirement to rein in growth of revenues end expenditures

a commitment made by elected officials and candidates for elected office never to raise taxes

Raising the bar for tax increases

Requiring a cool-off period for all bills with a fiscal impact

pork-barrel spending - the broken windows of the budget

One More Time, All Together: The "Stimulus" Worked!

Wednesday, August 25, 2010 3:53 PM Add to Facebook Add to Twitter

...or so you might believe, after a cursory glance at the Congressional Budget Office's most recent "stimulus" report, which they are required, by mandate in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, to release every so often as a reminder that the government is, indeed, still wasting taxpayer money.

The problem, to borrow from the great Yogi Berra, is that this is just "deja vu all over again." Every few months the CBO essentially releases the same report they've been circling for the past 18 months, just with a few new numbers punched in. Even CBO's director, Doug Elmendorf, has been explicit regarding the fallacy of the CBO report, admitting that the legally-required exercise is one that is designed as a self-fulfilling prophesy to report the success of the "stimulus."

This is because the numbers in the CBO reports are achieved by using models based on the same fuzzy math that got us the political talking point of jobs "saved or created" to begin with. Every few months CBO tells us that the "stimulus" created jobs because it is using calculations that were designed to show that the "stimulus" would create jobs. Elmendorf has admitted that this metric would not be able to demonstrate that the "stimulus" failed its objectives, because it was simply not designed to encapsulate such an occurance. Unsurprinsgly, this recycled rhetoric has done nothing to change the dismal economy.

Tags: FederalSpending Federal | Comments (5)

Reader Comments:

With the bases lodead you struck us out with that answer!
Marsue / Your Location January 14, 2012 @ 4:54 pm ID: 200809190
lmt1D7 ajsekyaknquz
wqtertvet / Your Location January 15, 2012 @ 4:36 am ID: 200809231
osUDYR , [url=http://xdzlkwbklvxw.com/]xdzlkwbklvxw[/url], [link=http://krqxphiqtqnv.com/]krqxphiqtqnv[/link], http://ybtqrhskuruc.com/
qunaisqb / Your Location January 15, 2012 @ 9:12 am ID: 200809265
reifYB axlcybldjpxe
itptwmwzzo / Your Location January 17, 2012 @ 8:31 am ID: 200809320
EXGEyo , [url=http://topkovadsyvm.com/]topkovadsyvm[/url], [link=http://iylzxpdtyznf.com/]iylzxpdtyznf[/link], http://rlvvfbhgnaau.com/
wezyrdhofch / Your Location January 19, 2012 @ 8:35 am ID: 200809348
Add a commentYour email address will not be displayed but will be added to our contact database. If you do not wish us to contact you, please leave that field blank.



Enter the Characters Below:



A Special Project of
atr.org

722 12th Street NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC
202-785-0261
friends@atr.org

Website Design and Development by Braynard Group, Inc.