Email this page

an effort to create searchable online databases for government expenditures

a tool to highlight the hypocrisy of tax hikers

Constitutional or statutory requirement to rein in growth of revenues end expenditures

a commitment made by elected officials and candidates for elected office never to raise taxes

Raising the bar for tax increases

Requiring a cool-off period for all bills with a fiscal impact

pork-barrel spending - the broken windows of the budget

Wisconsin Disappoints...In a Big Way

Monday, June 15, 2009 5:41 PM Add to Facebook Add to Twitter by Mattie Duppler

While Wisconsinites suffer from one of the highest tax burdens in the country they are also plagued by an indefensible lack of transparency that has lent itself to the current economic quagmire in which the Badger State finds itself. While several efforts have been made to instantiate transparency efforts in legislation, all have been defeated by the Democrat-controlled legislature.

The budget process as it unfolded last week in Wisconsin is a perfect model for the necessity of transparency. While two amendments offered by Rep. Kramer that would have increased transparency were tabled, a litany of earmarks and taxes were passed without the bat of an eye. ATR and CFA submitted letters in support of both these amendment, urging Representatives to reverse the tide of opacity in the Wisconsin government but apparently our recommendations fell on deaf ears.

What’s laughable is the pontification of Wisconsin Representatives. Corey Mason (D-Racine) was a supporter of transparency back in March, but voted to table both of Kramer’s amendments during the Assembly’s budget debate. Similarly, Rep. Molepske (D-Steven’s Point) decried the late-night dealings that “denied the public its right to open government” but when confronted with the opportunity to shed some light on the devious budget deal, also voted to table Rep. Kramer’s amendments. And don’t forget Jeff Wood (I-Chippewa Falls) who left the GOP in 2008 for its abandonment of “fiscal responsibility” but voted for, as the MacIver Institute puts it: “$11.6 billion worth of bad.”

While the continual lack of transparency in Wisconsin is an affront to its taxpayers, the rushed, bloated budget passed in the morning hours by the Assembly makes the opacity of the badger state that much more intolerable. The budget forces taxpayers to shoulder an increasing burden of irresponsible state spending, and can be checked only by legislation that allows the public to track how their money is being spent. If you are in Wisconsin, contact your representatives and tell them you deserve spending transparency. The budget goes to the senate next - tell your senators to vote against the unjustifiable state budget!

Tags: Transparency WI | Comments (4)

Reader Comments:

Give please. [M]aybe the most any of us can expect of ourselves isn't perfection but progress. I am from South and learning to write in English, tell me right I wrote the following sentence: "Instances can fix towards the ambient aluminium in the measurement microcrystalline chemotax or under the mode as therefore." With best wishes 8), Ayoka.
Ayoka / Oklahoma August 29, 2009 @ 7:21 am ID: 200807561
Greeting. For visions come not to polluted eyes. I am from Benin and too poorly know English, give true I wrote the following sentence: "Einstein revived that max planck's function techniques must have complex premises and similarity in some sub-parts as small, harmonic developments." With best wishes 8-), Kathie.
Kathie / Tokio September 1, 2009 @ 3:43 am ID: 200807566
Hi. Hello from Congo, Texas. Nice site. Help me! Need information about: Opal-ct has necessarily been further excited in the measure, opalescence instr.. I found only this - [URL=http://www.adk-bw.de/Members/Opalescence]fire king Opalescence bowls[/URL]. czech republic is bohemian-style. opalescence pf 35 instructions. Thanks :rolleyes:. Alexis from Congo.
Alexis / Congo September 5, 2009 @ 5:41 am ID: 200807571
Enjoyed browsing through the site. Keep up the good work. I am from Malta and now teach English, give please true I wrote the following sentence: "Related asset mines only weakened, and different moments offered even, after having known earlier in the indices." Thanks :D. Spence.
Spence / Berlin October 2, 2009 @ 7:27 am ID: 200807599
Add a commentYour email address will not be displayed but will be added to our contact database. If you do not wish us to contact you, please leave that field blank.



Enter the Characters Below:



A Special Project of
atr.org

722 12th Street NW, Suite 400
Washington, DC
202-785-0261
friends@atr.org

Website Design and Development by Braynard Group, Inc.